این سازمان [سازمان پدافند غیرعامل ایران] وظیفه ایجاد هماهنگی میان نهادهای مختلف حکومتی به منظور آماده سازی آنها برای مقابله غیرنظامی با حملات نظامی احتمالی را بر عهده دارد، تا درصورت انجام حمله علیه ایران، خسارت های وارد شده به زیر ساخت ها و تأسیسات را به حداقل برسد.

خبرگزارش [کذا] آمریکایی آسوشیتدپرس نیز با انتشار بازتاب این خبر به گوشه‌ای از سخنان سردار حاجی‌زاده در خصوص رمزگشایی این پهپاد اشاره کرد و گفت که ایران روز یکشنبه اعلام کرد که با مهندسی معکوس هواپیمای جاسوسی آمریکا که به تسخیر سپاه درآمده بود، ساخت یک نسخه از این هواپیما را آغاز کرده است.

• Picasa users are not informed that their Picasa links will be redirected to Google+;
• Those without Google accounts cannot download photos at full resolution from privately shared albums on Google+;
• Google appears to be hijacking users’ Picasa links to promote its Google+ service.

Now, I do like Google+ (you’ll find me there here), but when I share a link to one of my Picasa albums, I don’t want my friends to be redirected to Google+. Fortunately, there is a solution: add “?noredirect=1″ to the URL. For example, this is the link to my public Picasa albums:

https://picasaweb.google.com/116790950801070160641

Clicking on that link redirects you to my albums on Google+. But the following modified link will not be redirected:

https://picasaweb.google.com/116790950801070160641?noredirect=1

If the link you want to share already includes parameters after a question mark (as will links to privately shared albums), then simply add “&noredirect=1″ to those parameters.

But we shouldn’t have to manually edit Picasa URLs to prevent them from being automatically redirected. Google should fix this by ceasing automatic redirects and offering Picasa users who so desire the option of sharing albums via Google+.

Mansour Arbabsiar

Today I learned that US citizens may be added to the “Specially Designated Nationals” (SDN) list maintained by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. Those who are added to this list have their assets blocked “and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing with them.”

On Tuesday, 11 October 2011, US citizen Mansour Arbabsiar (who also holds Iranian citizenship) was added to the SDN list:

ARBABSIAR, Manssor (a.k.a. ARBABSIAR, Mansour), 805 Cisco Valley CV, Round Rock, TX  78664; 5403 Everhardt Road, Corpus Christi, TX  78411; DOB 15 Mar 1955; alt. DOB 6 Mar 1955; POB Iran; citizen United States; Driver’s License No. 07442833 (United States)  expires 15 Mar 2016; Passport C2002515 (Iran); alt. Passport 477845448 (United States); Driver’s License is issued by the State of Texas (individual) [SDGT] [IRGC]

Arbabsiar is in custody on charges of conspiring, among other things, to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States.

I am not a lawyer, but it sure seems to me that pre-trial blocking of a citizen’s assets and prohibiting US persons from dealing with them amounts to punishment without due process of law.

Other United States citizens on the SDN list include Anwar Nasser Aulaqi (who remains on the list some two weeks after his assassination-by-drone), alleged Mexican drug cartel bosses Blanca Cázares Salazar and Victor Cázares Gastelum, alleged Shabab militia member Omar Shafik Hammami, alleged terrorist plotter Raed M. Hijazi, Muhammad Hamid Khalil Salah, who was “found not guilty of conspiring to illegally finance Hamas terrorist activities in Israel” but was convicted on an obstruction of justice charge “related to lies prosecutors said he told about his ties to Hamas,” and Abdul Rahman Yasin, who is wanted in connection with the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

On 11 September 2001, as 19 men hijacked four passenger planes and crashed them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan, the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and a field near Shankstown, Pennsylvania, I was completely oblivious, cut off from news of the world aboard an American Airlines flight bound from Amsterdam to Washington, DC. I was going to Washington to be interviewed by CBS 60 Minutes II for a report on the US government’s reliance on polygraph screening. At the time, the top news story in the United States was the disappearance of Chandra Levy, 24-year-old intern with the Federal Bureau of Prisons in Washington, DC, who had been having an extra-marital affair with US Representative Gary Condit. There was open speculation that Condit was responsible for Levy’s disappearance, and Condit had taken a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent in an attempt to clear his name.

The aircraft had just passed Iceland when the pilot came over the intercom with an announcement: the aircraft was leaking fuel, and the best option was to turn around and return to Amsterdam. I recall thinking two things: 1) if we’re leaking fuel, isn’t the best option to land at the nearest airfield (that is, in Iceland)? and 2) how am I going to make it to the interview in DC? I figured the fuel leak couldn’t be too serious if the plane was capable of reaching Amsterdam. After all, Amsterdam was almost as far away as Washington by that time. I passed the time watching part of the in-flight movie, Bridget Jones’ Diary, but it didn’t keep my interest.

Arriving back in Amsterdam, I and the other passengers exited the aircraft. The pilot requested that everyone remain near the gate, and that he would make an announcement. I expected that he would be announcing alternative flights to DC, and thus I waited with great anticipation. But what the pilot announced was that two passenger aircraft had been hijacked and flown into the towers of the World Trade Center, which had been destroyed. Another passenger aircraft had been hijacked and flown into the Pentagon, which was in flames. Another aircraft had been hijacked and crashed in Pennsylvania. United States airspace was indefinitely closed to all commercial aviation. Our luggage would be offloaded and we could collect it in the baggage hall.

It became clear that the story about the plane leaking fuel was an expedient lie. The airline must not have wanted to alert any potential hijackers who might yet be aboard flights in the air, or to unduly cause panic. Televisions in Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport were all tuned to CNN International, and I watched for a long time before proceeding to the baggage hall. The pilot had said that the World Trade Center was destroyed. Some of the people being interviewed also spoke of the towers having collapsed. But the only video CNN International was showing was of the towers on fire, yet still standing. I’m not certain, but I think CNN may have deliberately delayed international broadcasting of the collapse of the towers.

Upon collecting my luggage, I went to buy a train ticket for the ride back home to The Hague. But there was a problem: the trains were not running, allegedly due to mechanical problems. I suspected that the trains had been halted as a security measure. Alternative bus service had been made available, and I got on a bus for The Hague. A stranger lent me his cell phone (I did not own one at the time) to call home.

Arriving back home in The Hague, I spent the rest of the day glued to the television and the Internet (I had a dial-up connection then), following news of the attacks (and wondering whether any more attacks would be forthcoming). I contacted the producer at CBS 60 Minutes II, who informed me that the interview would be rescheduled. It eventually took place in early December 2001, in midtown Manhattan. After the interview, another interviewee and I took a taxi down to the site of the World Trade Center. It had a special meaning for me, because I had worked with the FBI’s counterterrorism task force during the investigation of the 1993 bombing that killed six and injured hundreds of people. We got as close as we could, and I recall that nearly three months after the collapse of the towers, the air still had an acrid smell. Standing on the steps of Federal Hall on Wall Street, I got an uncomfortable tickle in the back of my throat. I can only begin to imagine how unhealthful the air was for emergency workers and residents.

On Saturday, 7 May 2011, the Pentagon released five video clips of Bin Laden (with the audio removed). Although there is no direct indication of the date of these videos, it can be inferred that one of the videos was recorded on or about 24 January 2010:

At right is a freeze-frame of what Bin Laden is shown watching. The title at the top of the screen reads, “From Osama to Obama” (من آسامة إلى آوباما). This is the title of an audio message from Bin Laden to President Barack Obama that was publicly released on 24 January 2010. Thus, it can be inferred that the video of Bin Laden watching a news story about that audio message was recorded either on or shortly after 24 January 2010. In any event, the video cannot have been recorded earlier than 24 January 2010.

Note also that Bin Laden’s attire in the video–a watch cap with a blanket around his shoulders–is consistent with winter weather in Abbotabad, Pakistan, where in January the average low temperature is 2° C (35° F) and the average high is 12° C (53° F).

UPDATE: Further indication that the “From Osama to Obama” audio release was new at the time Bin Laden is seen watching it is found in the scrolling news banner at the bottom of the television screen (at about 1:09). The headline reads: “New audio recording attributed to Osama Bin Laden in which he claims [responsibility] for the attempt to blow up an American airplane…” (…تسجيل صوتي جديد منسوب لآسامة بن لادن يتبنى فيه محاولة تفجير طائرة امريكية).