Comments on: About Myself http://www.georgemaschke.net Musings of an American in Holland Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:26:13 +0000 hourly 1 By: George Maschke http://www.georgemaschke.net/about-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-12579 George Maschke Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:44:10 +0000 http://www.georgemaschke.net/?page_id=3#comment-12579 Kallie, With regard to Scientology's E-meter, "incredible" is the operative word. To learn more about it, see: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/E-Meter/ Kallie,

With regard to Scientology’s E-meter, “incredible” is the operative word. To learn more about it, see:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/E-Meter/

]]> By: Kallie Dalene http://www.georgemaschke.net/about-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-12569 Kallie Dalene Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:03:15 +0000 http://www.georgemaschke.net/?page_id=3#comment-12569 I learned about your belief that the polygraph is deceptive. Have you ever been able to do research on the e-meter, which they use in Scientology? I don't belong to this religion but I've heard incredible things about this and how it works. I learned about your belief that the polygraph is deceptive. Have you ever been able to do research on the e-meter, which they use in Scientology? I don’t belong to this religion but I’ve heard incredible things about this and how it works.

]]> By: Ricardo Maldonado http://www.georgemaschke.net/about-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-5268 Ricardo Maldonado Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:45:20 +0000 http://www.georgemaschke.net/?page_id=3#comment-5268 I recently discovered your website and org. through the washington post. wow! it confirms my long standing belief that no machine can determine who is lying and who is not. when i first heard about this machine i did not beleive the B.S sales pitch. before i continue i should point out that i am not nor am i involved in any kind of law enforcement, i am just an ordinary citizen. I do have a question, in California the polygraph test is not admissable in court. are the results admissable?. and my last question, how are employers allowed to use the polygraph and its results against or for and individual if the courts do not ?. i am not sure if i stated this correctly, legal language is almost like latin, hard to read and even harder to understand. I recently discovered your website and org. through the washington post. wow! it confirms my long standing belief that no machine can determine who is lying and who is not. when i first heard about this machine i did not beleive the B.S sales pitch. before i continue i should point out that i am not nor am i involved in any kind of law enforcement, i am just an ordinary citizen. I do have a question, in California the polygraph test is not admissable in court. are the results admissable?. and my last question, how are employers allowed to use the polygraph and its results against or for and individual if the courts do not ?. i am not sure if i stated this correctly, legal language is almost like latin, hard to read and even harder to understand.

]]>