On Tuesday, 8 June 2010, progressive Democrat Marcy Winograd is challenging blue dog incumbent Jane Harman for the party’s nomination for California’s 36th district congressional seat. I support Winograd because of her firm antiwar position. (Harman backed the invasion of Iraq.) I also appreciate Winograd’s denunciation of Israel’s recent commando raid on volunteers bringing humanitarian aid to Gaza, and am offended by Harman’s “Bubble” television ad smearing Winograd. If Jane Harman is your representative, I hope you’ll vote for Marcy Winograd this Tuesday!
If the two candidates’ standings on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are anything to go by, it looks like Winograd has a real chance of unseating Harman.
As of early Sunday morning California time, on Facebook, Jane Harman has 1,080 friends compared to 2,412 for Marcy Winograd:
On Twitter, Harman has 226 followers compared to 497 for Winograd:
And on YouTube, Harman’s campaign has just one subscriber, while Winograd’s has 28:


















Social Media Site Standings a Poor Predictor of Electoral Outcome in California’s 36th Congressional District
Although as observed in my earlier post, progressive challenger Marcy Winograd had significantly more friends/followers/subscribers on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube than incumbent Jane Harman going into the Democratic party primary for California’s 36th congressional district, Harman handily won the election with 59% of the vote versus 41% for Winograd. In terms of raw numbers, Harman received 22,446 votes versus 15,732 for Winograd. As it turns out, the great majority of those voting in the primary followed neither candidate on social media sites.